Summit on Gender and the Postdoctorate: vol. 1
Last week, I attended the National Postdoctoral Association'sSummit on Gender and the Postdoctorate, which was held in Philadelphia last week, on March 11-12. I started writing up my thoughts about the meeting, and it started to get really long, so I've decided to break it up into a series of posts. The presentations will all be made available on the web eventually, but I'll present some highlights (and my own personal take on things) here.
Since my last post on employment sparked a bunch of discussion, I thought I would start by discussing the postdoc in terms of career trajectories. The upshot of the comments on my previous post is that there are plenty of valid career options for PhDs in astronomy, and that both early career astronomers (i.e. grad students and postdocs) and those training them need to be aware of the options, and to not view a research faculty positions as the be-all and end-all of a successful career.
The thing is, the postdoc is fundamentally a transitional period. It is a phase of training that helps newly-minted PhD acquire and polish skills they need to become successful independent researchers, but also a holding pattern of temporary employment while waiting for a permanent position to open up. So why have a meeting on gender and the postdoctorate?
First, the length of the postdoctoral period is lengthening across all disciplines. Second, in comparing different disciplines, the longer the postdoctoral period, the fewer women make it to the tenure track. Given spending six years as a postdoc in astronomy is pretty common, this is a cause for concern. While this meeting emphasized the academic career path, to be fair, it's hard to get statistics on other sectors. Also, there are good reasons to consider academia as a measure for how well women (and minorities for that matter) are being retained: because diversity in the teaching faculty boosts diversity in the student body, and because if there's a gender disparity at that level, that indicates that there is a problem in the system as a whole.
Presenting early-career scientists non-academic career choices is a great idea. However, I worry a little that this always comes up when discussing women in science. Encouraging non-tenure track options for all scientists is great, but encouraging only women (and minorities for that matter) to consider alternative career options only exacerbates the problem.
- Career Profiles: Astronomer To Tenured Full Professor
The AAS Committee on the Status of Women in Astronomy and the AAS Employment Committee have compiled dozens of interviews highlighting the diversity of career trajectories available to astronomers. The interviews share advice and lessons learned from...
- Work-life Balance: Hours
I recently came across the following article in the AAAS journal Science. Title: A Cosmologist Resists Academia's Work-Life Norms The article begins with, "Sarah Bridle is concerned about the low number of women in academia in physics and astronomy...
- Summit On Gender And The Postdoctorate: Vol. 3
Here's (finally!) the last of my posts summarizing the 2-day Summit on Gender and the Postdoctorate. The first two posts are here and here. Overall, the meeting had a heavy emphasis on mentoring: why mentors are helpful, how mentors differ from advisors,...
- Aas Employment Session
I am writing this on my way to Philadelphia, where I will be attending the Summit on Gender and the Postdoctorate, hosted by the National Postdoctoral Association. I'll post a report on the meeting next week, but for now I'll (finally!) post a...
- Preparing For The Storm
So, part of the reason I haven't been posting frequently these recent months is that I have this great big issue hanging over my head, like a cloud appearing over the horizon, but steadily coming closer and casting a shadow over everything. Things...